Flock CEO Seeks Compromise Amid License Plate Camera Backlash

Flock Safety's AI-powered license plate cameras have been at the center of a growing controversy in the US, with lawmakers from both parties introducing bills to ban or restrict their use. In response, Flock CEO Garrett Langley called for 'compromise' between privacy and safety, arguing that an outright ban would be like banning vehicles.

Langley cited drunk driving laws and seatbelt requirements as examples of regulations that balance individual freedoms with public safety concerns. He also acknowledged the company's own role in addressing concerns about data retention and officer accountability, including implementing a tool to flag abnormal search patterns.

However, Senator Bernie Sanders has taken a stronger stance, tweeting 'STOP FLOCK' and describing the technology as an example of 'AI mass surveillance.' A recent investigation by The Washington Post found that police departments were not regularly auditing how officers used the cameras, with at least 69 officials accused or convicted of misusing them.

Flock has estimated its technology contributed to about 20% of cleared cases in jurisdictions where its cameras are used. Langley emphasized the need for third-party attestation before deploying AI tools in public safety, calling it 'a very dangerous tool' that requires careful regulation.